Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Transportation Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves 4-way stop at 211 and McIntyre after traffic study found sight-line, safety issues

5914564 · October 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County commissioners approved Resolution 2025-34 to install a four-way stop at 211 and McIntyre Road following an Olson Engineering analysis that cited a previous fatality and sight-line obstruction from tall corn; installation will require minor asphalt removal and utility locates.

Leavenworth County commissioners approved Resolution 2025-34 to place a four-way stop at the intersection of 211 (Eleventh) and McIntyre Road after staff presented an engineering study and resident safety concerns.

Bill (county public-works staff) told the commission an Olson Engineering analysis found generally low crash rates but identified a previous fatal collision and a lack of sight lines for northbound drivers when corn reaches field height, which can obscure eastbound traffic. The recommendation was a four-way stop to ensure vehicles fully stop and improve sight lines.

Installation logistics and cost: Bill said the stop will require removing asphalt in the southeast quadrant, calling for a utility locate and saw cutting before setting posts and pavement work; the project will not be immediate but expected within about a week and a half. County staff estimated the traffic study and implementation costs at roughly $8,000–$10,000.

Resident and staff comments: Commissioners said they had received calls from school bus drivers and parents about safety at the intersection. County counsel explained that placement of traffic-control devices typically follows engineering standards and traffic studies; courts have required studies in claims where signage was changed without engineering analysis. A commissioner noted that initial engineering costs can be sizable but justified by safety concerns; another asked, “What’s a life worth?” during discussion of the implementation cost.

Outcome: The motion to adopt Resolution 2025-34 passed unanimously. Staff said the city/county will schedule the asphalt work and install the signs after completing utility locates and excavation for the sign base.

Ending: Commissioners encouraged residents to bring safety concerns forward; staff said the county prioritized projects using accident counts and public input and had previously used CARES and ARPA funds for roadwork in accident-prone areas.