Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mills Act topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Salinas HRB recommends Mills Act contract for 14 Los Corrales Avenue
Summary
The Salinas Historic Resources Board voted to recommend that the City Council designate 14 Los Corrales Avenue as a local historic resource and approve a Mills Act contract, advancing the homeowner's 10-year exterior preservation plan to the council for final action.
Get email alerts on the Mills Act topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Salinas Historic Resources Board voted to recommend that the City Council designate 14 Los Corrales Avenue as a local historic resource and approve the property's application to participate in the Mills Act tax-incentive program.
The recommendation moves the application to the Salinas City Council for final decision; if the council approves the Mills Act contract, it will be filed with the Monterey County Recorder and the county assessor will recalculate the property's tax assessment, with the contract taking effect January 1 of the following year.
Assistant planner Yesenia Segovia presented the application, saying the city opened a Mills Act application window from May through June and received a single application for 14 Los Corrales Avenue. Segovia summarized the Mills Act requirements: a Mills Act contract is a tax-reduction agreement between the city and a property owner for a designated historic resource; the property must be listed as a historic resource by the city council (or on an official federal, state, or county register) to qualify; the contract has a minimum 10-year term and generally extends automatically one year on each anniversary; and participants must submit a maintenance plan and use tax savings for restoration and maintenance consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. Segovia also noted that the parcel appears on the 1989 Salinas survey as potentially eligible for designation and that staff finds the submitted application and work plan meet the city's Mills Act requirements.
The board asked detailed questions about the applicant's 10-year maintenance plan, cost estimates and the mechanics of verifying work. Board members raised concerns about the plan's level of detail and whether year-to-year reports would reflect that projects with high up-front cost (for example a roof) might be completed early in the contract and thus show no further expense in later years. Segovia and other staff clarified that the Mills Act administration focuses on exterior preservation under the city's historic resources ordinance, that annual reports are required from participating owners, and that property inspections occur at least every five years or as needed.
The applicant (identified in the record as the property owners) told the board they have original purchase records, architect and materials documentation and framed original plans and said they could make those documents available to staff. The owners said some paperwork was not brought to the meeting but is in their possession.
Board members and staff discussed the applicant's maintenance timeline. The submitted schedule lists work examples by year: 2026—restore wood-trim windows; 2027—rehabilitate and restore original steel windows; 2028—reroof using Spanish clay tiles; 2029—replace garage doors; 2030—driveway rehabilitation; 2031—complete exterior repainting. Segovia said estimates are preliminary and that the city will review annual reports and receipts to verify work completed against the maintenance plan.
After discussion, a motion to recommend designation and Mills Act approval was seconded and adopted by roll call. The record shows affirmative votes from Board Members Munoz, Shim, Hirahara, Callender, Wadsworth and Chair Masgay. No additional conditions were attached by the board; board members emphasized that administration of compliance and annual reports is handled by city staff under the Mills Act contract.
The board's recommendation does not itself grant tax relief; it forwards the application to City Council, which must take the final action and, if it approves, the county will record the contract and recalculate taxes. Staff said the contract binds successive owners and requires participants to spend tax savings on the preservation work described in their maintenance plan.
The board thanked staff and the homeowners for preparing the application and deferred to the city for final administration and inspection work.

