The Public Works Committee on Oct. 8 discussed steps to reduce roadside trash and ensure loads to the landfill are covered, including posted signage, encroachment permits and enforcement by law officers.

Director Mark Neary told the committee he had "permission to do that as long as it's in an ordinance that can be, utilized, and I believe it is," but said staff must decide sign size, location and obtain an encroachment permit. Neary also cautioned that signs alone may not stop littering and that enforcement is important.

Sheriff Lester was cited by staff as an enforcement partner; Neary said deputies and highway patrol officers can stop vehicles with unsecured loads. Commissioner Dan Callahan said it is "state law that anytime they, see somebody's load unsecured, they can pull them over and at least give them a warning." Callahan recommended starting with warnings and then issuing tickets if noncompliance continues.

Committee members debated where to place signs and whether to rely on one large sign or multiple signs, noting Iron Street's 35 mph limit as a location where a single sign might be adequate. Callahan suggested also placing a sign on Santa Claus Road near a local landmark. Staff flagged practical issues including sign visibility at 65 mph highway speeds, the need for encroachment permits, and the risk that turning vehicles away from the landfill could lead them to dump illegally elsewhere.

The committee agreed to hold communication number 202-5297 for one more meeting to gather additional ideas and coordination with Sheriff Lester and possibly the highway patrol. A motion to keep the communication on the docket passed with Commissioner Bill Boyle recorded as second.

Discussion only: committee members considered signage, public education and enforcement strategies. Direction/assignment: staff received permission to pursue sign details and to seek necessary encroachment permits and coordination with law enforcement. Formal action: committee voted to hold the communication for additional follow-up; no ordinance or enforcement policy was formally adopted at the Oct. 8 meeting.

Next steps: staff will return with sign specifications, locations, permit requirements and proposed enforcement coordination.