Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Portrait Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee Adopts 10-Year Rule for Portraits; SB186 Amended and SB200 Moved ITL
Summary
The committee adopted an amendment adding a 10-year waiting period after a subject's death before a portrait may be placed in legislative-controlled spaces. Senators' portrait bills (SB186 amended; SB200) were handled in executive session: SB186 was amended and recommended OTPA on consent; SB200 received an ITL recommendation.
A House committee voted to adopt an amendment to Senate Bill 186 that would require at least a 10-year interval after a person's death before a portrait may be accepted for placement in areas controlled by the General Court. The committee adopted the amendment, then voted that SB186, as amended, ought to pass; the measure was placed on the committee consent calendar.
Committee members discussed space limitations in the State House and the Legislative Office Building, existing statutory authority for placement (references to RSA 1414-B and the Joint Legislative Historical Committee), the desirability of clear criteria beyond "exemplary and noteworthy," and possible exception pathways (for example, a supermajority vote) for cases members believe warrant expedited placement. Several members suggested that the Joint Legislative Historical Committee and the Legislative Facilities Committee should be the primary bodies to develop and apply placement and size rules.
Representative Turcotte presented a replace-all-style amendment (noting that many states set waiting periods ranging from two to 25 years) and said his draft adopted a 10-year posthumous waiting period and an expectation that the subject have "exemplary and noteworthy" service to the state. Members debated whether the waiting period should count from the date of death or the date of service; several suggested an exceptions pathway (for example, legislative override by supermajority) for exceptional cases.
The committee adopted the amendment (amendment 2025-2993h) by unanimous hand vote, and then recorded a roll-call to recommend SB186 as amended (OTPA) and put it on consent. The committee also considered Senate Bill 200, which addresses related portrait placement, and recommended ITL on that bill in executive session.
Speakers noted maintenance and space constraints: the Joint Historical Committee receives annual funding for preservation, and committee members said available wall space in the State House is limited, with some portrait placement shifted to the Legislative Office Building or archived storage. Members asked that future language clarify costs and maintenance funding and suggested the amendment could be revised later to add an exception mechanism if appropriate.
