Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges stronger code enforcement on unkempt lots; staff outlines current notification process
Summary
A resident raised repeated concerns about overgrown yards and vehicles on private lots; city staff described current complaint-driven enforcement steps including letters, mowing by Parks and Rec, and billing the property owner.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
In public forum, resident Sue Bandicamp (1233 H Avenue) returned to the council to press for action on unmaintained private lots and overgrown yards.
“I was up here about a month ago to talk about … the way some property looks around town,” Sue said. She asked whether the city would send notice letters to property owners, for example included with water bills, and urged more consistent enforcement: “People aren't mowing their lawns. Maybe once or twice a year, it seems like.”
A city staff member identified by the transcript as Ryan (code enforcement) responded that he believed he knew the properties in question and described the standard complaint-and-notice process: staff checks properties, issues letters to repeat offenders, and if properties are not maintained the city’s Parks & Rec will mow and the city bills the homeowner. The staff member said the city code does not limit the number of vehicles a property owner can keep, so enforcement is limited when vehicles are registered and operable.
When asked about the timeline from notice to city mowing, staff said he did not have that data immediately but offered to look into specific timelines and follow up with the resident. “Generally, as Ryan Hunt receives complaints or concerns and as he checks on kind of repeat offenders, sends a letter stating it needs to be mowed. And if it doesn't get mowed, then he gets with Parks and Rec, and they they mow it and then, bill a homeowner for it,” the staff speaker said.
Sue said she would likely return if conditions had not improved. Councilmembers acknowledged the complaint and asked staff to provide timelines and follow-up steps so residents can understand the enforcement process.
No ordinance change or enforcement action was adopted at the meeting; staff asked to follow up with Sue and provide the timeline and any next steps.

