Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Manager Search topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cocoa Beach commissioners pick five finalists for city manager interviews
Summary
After a public straw poll, the Cocoa Beach City Commission chose five finalists from a 49-candidate pool for one-on-one interviews; the commission will hold one-on-one interviews and a follow-up public meeting before making a final selection.
The Cocoa Beach City Commission selected five finalists for one-on-one interviews in its public meeting, advancing Taylor Brown, Michael Henn, Michael McLaughlin, Susan Sherman and Nathan (Nate) Summers to the next stage of the city manager search.
The selection followed a public straw-poll process run during the meeting. The city attorney reminded commissioners that, under the Florida Sunshine Law, they must begin from the full slate of candidates and that the commission had materials on all 49 applicants. "Under the Florida sunshine law, we are going to need to start from the full, I believe it was 49 candidates," the city attorney said.
Why it matters: the interviews narrow the field for the city’s chief executive role and set the timeline for a public finalist forum and a final commission decision. The commission’s shortlist will be invited to a series of one-on-one interviews; staff will post commissioners’ selections on the public spreadsheet used for the straw poll, and the search consultant will notify candidates directly.
Commissioners conducted a public, nonbinding straw poll during the meeting; Karen, a city staff member, tallied selections live so the public could see who each commissioner picked. The search consultant noted that his firm had provided an in-depth review of eight recommended candidates and that those eight fall under the firm’s warranty for replacement if a recommended finalist cannot take the job within a year. "Just the 8 candidates, and they those fall under our warranty," the search consultant said.
Commissioners discussed the need for a strong consensus on the final choice. Several members warned that a manager selected by a narrow 3–2 vote could face instability in the job. Commissioners also discussed contingency options if the finalists decline or consensus cannot be reached, including negotiating with second-choice candidates or asking the current acting city manager to remain while the city grooms an internal successor.
After the straw poll produced the five highest-scoring names, a commissioner moved the recommended slate; another commissioner seconded the motion. The commission then voted, and the motion carried, "Motion passes 5 0," as recorded in the meeting minutes.
Next steps: the search consultant will contact the five finalists to schedule one-on-one interviews; commissioners were told those interviews would be held over a weekend time frame at the end of the month and that the commission will reconvene in public after the finalist interviews so the public can ask questions and the commission can make or defer a selection.
The commission and staff emphasized that any candidate who is selected and then cannot fulfill the role within the first year may be replaced under the consulting firm’s warranty only if that person was among the eight candidates the firm fully vetted. The interview logistics described in the meeting include in-person reception events and an interview start time noted by staff as 8:45 a.m. for the one-on-one sessions.
The commission framed the process as an iterative, public one: public straw poll → finalist one-on-one interviews → public finalist meeting → potential selection or deferral.
