Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Recall topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public comment at Josephine County meeting centers on recall effort, library dispute and calls for unity
Summary
Dozens of residents used the Oct. 9 public-comment period to debate a recall effort targeting county commissioners, accuse rivals of outside coordination, raise concerns about harassment and security, and call for civil discourse; commissioners responded with appeals for unity and offered door-to-door engagement.
Public comment at the Josephine County Board of Commissioners meeting on Oct. 9 turned into a prolonged debate over an active recall effort, accusations that outside groups are driving petitions and repeated calls for civility.
Speakers for and against recall circulated competing claims about the organizers, motives and tactics. Several people named a group called Indivisible and a local affiliate, Rogue Indivisible, as involved in the petition drive; others denied outside coordination and said the recall originated locally. At least one speaker alleged police and security overreach earlier in the week.
During the public-comment period, speakers addressed the board on a wide range of concerns but frequently returned to the recall and the library lease dispute. Jim Goodwin said the recall campaign was a “strategic maneuver by a group of former county employees backed by the national left wing organization, Indivisible,” and challenged commissioners to retract related statements; Libra Herrera and other speakers countered that Rogue Indivisible and local volunteers had played a central role in gathering signatures and urged residents to research the organization’s materials before concluding who is responsible.
Several speakers complained about online posts that they said targeted private citizens. Rachel Parker asked the board to "publicly condemn the harassment, doxing, and intimidation of community members regardless of their stance on the recall," to clarify that pro-commissioner social pages are not official county entities and to affirm the county’s commitment to civil discourse. “Real unity doesn't come from silence or slogans,” she said.
Others described specific incidents. Victor of Grants Pass told the board he had been removed from a recent administrative workshop after refusing to identify himself, and said law enforcement responded to the meeting; he described the encounter and said he has video. The board acknowledged the security incident earlier in the week; Chair (the presiding commissioner) thanked sheriff’s staff for their response and said the county takes security seriously.
Commissioners used their response time to urge residents toward civil engagement. Commissioner Smith said he was glad to see public participation but asked critics to bring “solutions” and said the county needs economic development to address long-term problems. Commissioner Barnett praised speakers who supported the board and described the recall as politically motivated. All three commissioners reiterated their willingness to meet with residents directly; Commissioner Andres (presiding) emphasized he is not active on social media and asked residents to bring concerns to him in person.
Why it matters: The public-comment exchange underscores deep divisions in the county over elected officials, public meetings and local organizing. Residents described alleged harassment, doxxing and threats; others said recalls are a legitimate democratic tool. Several speakers asked for public processes — including a proposed public debate on recall claims — to clarify competing allegations.
No formal board action on the recall or on social-media conduct was taken at the meeting; several speakers asked the commissioners to publicly denounce harassment and to affirm protections for residents who participate in local government.
