Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board allows subdivision variance to exceed 40-lot limit on dead-end road with fire mitigation condition

5920482 · October 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After reconsideration, Pennington County commissioners granted a subdivision variance allowing more than 40 lots on a dead-end road system for a property at Hazel Lane, imposing a condition that the applicant provide a fire mitigation plan before final plan application.

The Board of County Commissioners on Oct. 7 reconsidered a planning board decision and approved a variance allowing the creation of more than 40 lots on a dead-end road system for a parcel off Hazel Lane, subject to a county fire mitigation plan.

Assistant Planning Director Jason Thennison summarized staff's position: staff had recommended denial because (1) the county’s subdivision regulation limit of 40 dwelling units on a dead-end system could be exceeded only in the presence of special conditions and staff found none, and (2) Loveland Road District objected to the variance. The property sits in a planned unit development that had recently been amended and rezoned; Thennison’s memo noted that staff counted 42 existing lots on the dead-end system, including undeveloped but buildable lots.

Public comment included multiple area residents who opposed further capacity beyond what they said the zoning ordinance intended; neighbors expressed concerns about safety, access and the precedent of increasing the limit for the dead-end road system. The applicant, Kristen Bennett (participating via Zoom), said her original buyer had left the deal and that her intent in part was to preserve and renovate an existing log barn; she asked the board to allow the lot split so she could carry out work.

Commissioners considered prior precedents and the rationale for the 40‑unit limit, including public-safety concerns. The board approved the variance on a majority vote but attached one condition: prior to final plan approval the applicant must provide a fire mitigation plan for the proposed subdivision consistent with county fire requirements.

The board’s condition places responsibility on the property owner to work with county fire officials and demonstrate adequate mitigation before any final subdivision plan is accepted.