Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the CSM Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee discusses tightening CSM and rezoning thresholds as county land values rise
Summary
Richland County planning staff and the Natural Resources Committee discussed updating county rules for requiring certified survey maps (CSMs) on rezonings and parcel splits amid rising land values and boundary disputes.
The Richland County Natural Resources Committee discussed proposed changes to county policy on when a certified survey map (CSM) must accompany a rezoning or parcel split, and whether the county should change its current 10-acre threshold.
Staff told the committee that counties around Richland use varied thresholds — some require CSMs on any size rezoning, others set thresholds up to 40 acres, and nearby Crawford County uses a 15-acre threshold. Committee members said the purpose of requiring a CSM is to create a precise surveyed boundary and avoid disputes that arise when informal plats or uncertified surveys differ. Members discussed options including retaining a 10-acre requirement for most splits but requiring a CSM for rezonings and larger divisions or setting a new threshold (for example, 20 or 35 acres) for mandatory CSMs.
Staff and members agreed to develop draft wording for ordinance changes, to review examples from other counties, and to notify title companies and real-estate professionals about any change. The committee asked planning staff to present suggested language at an upcoming meeting so the committee can consider the tradeoffs between survey costs for private owners and the public value of accurate property records.
Committee members cited recent cases of boundary disagreements and higher land sale prices as reasons to consider tightening the rules for when survey maps are required. Staff plans to prepare sample ordinance language and bring comparative county examples to the next meeting for committee review.
