Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Signage Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission backs code change to standardize neighborhood association signs, limit messaging and lighting

5920745 · September 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Green Bay Planning Commission recommended Sept. 8 that the city council amend Section 30‑6 to specify standards for neighborhood association signs, including materials, size limits, a cap of two signs per neighborhood, and bans on internal lighting and commercial messaging.

The Green Bay Planning Commission recommended Sept. 8 that city council approve amendments to Section 30‑6 of the municipal code to clarify standards for neighborhood association identity signs, specifying placement, materials, size, lighting and allowable messaging.

City staff said the current “neighborhood signage” exemption in Chapter 30 lacks definition and has created inconsistent practice. The proposed text sets limits including a maximum of two signs per neighborhood association within the association boundary, a neighborhood‑identity panel constructed of weather‑resistant, high‑quality materials, a secondary message panel no taller than 2 feet, a maximum overall signage height (identity portion) and overall width consistent with the city’s neighborhood guide, and prohibition of internal illumination. Staff said external lighting is allowed if it is not attached to or directly illuminating the sign’s copy in a way that would convert it to a commercial display; the draft also prohibits attaching physical features such as flags directly to the sign and prohibits commercial messages on the sign.

Staff reported neighborhood outreach and said most associations use a standardized design; a neighborhood president who spoke at the hearing said the existing program was collaborative and requested grandfathering for long‑standing signs. Commissioners discussed how deviations could be pursued (staff said a zoning text amendment or variance process would be the route for nonstandard proposals) and noted the draft allows flexibility while protecting the identity panel as the sign’s focal point.

The commission voted to forward the amendment to city council with small drafting corrections the staff noted; the item will go to the council on Sept. 16.