Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Highway Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Highway commissioner warns of long-term shortfall; calls for county funding decisions
Summary
The highway commissioner told the committee that decades of reduced tax levy and a 2017 transfer have left highway funds strained, with current revenues covering only part of expenses and a possible need for new revenue or reprioritization of projects.
The Highway Commissioner told the Richland County Highway and Parks Committee that current county road funding is insufficient to maintain past work levels and that the department faces a structural shortfall without additional investment.
"Revenues only produced, $2,300,000. And then you could see in the next column expenses, we're at 3,500,000," the Highway Commissioner said while reviewing monthly financials, adding that the current fund balance had fallen to about $23,000 halfway through the year. The commissioner said that the county’s tax levy for the highway department has been stagnant for years and cited a transfer of $1,300,000 from the highway fund to the general fund in 2017 that was not restored.
"That started some pretty nasty downhill slope," the commissioner said of the 2017 transfer, describing it as a one-time move to cover general fund needs. The commissioner said the county has since paid off the related debt but did not restore the transferred funds to highway budgets. Committee discussion noted that the department’s maintenance program has been deferred for years and that continuing at current levels would result in near-zero construction and only bare-bones maintenance.
The Highway Commissioner outlined consequences: with current spending patterns the county would preserve staff and limited patching and mowing but could not sustain road reconstruction levels. "If we just maintain 6 miles per year, that's a 57 year rotation on roads," the commissioner said, and added that increasing material and construction costs since COVID have worsened the outlook.
Committee members discussed program accounts and potential funding tools, including wheel tax revenues and grant — the commissioner noted some offsetting state cost-share receipts and grant accounts but said the overall funding picture remained constrained. The commissioner urged the county board to discuss priorities and possible funding strategies, and recommended that the committee prepare options for the county board with clearer cost estimates and proposals for 2026 budgeting.
No formal policy or tax increase was enacted at the meeting; the commissioner asked the committee to consider how often it should meet and to prepare materials for the county board that would clarify desired roadwork levels and associated costs.
