Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Communications Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State board adopts communications policy after debate over when leadership may forward outside correspondence
Summary
After extensive debate over transparency and timeliness, the Utah State Board of Education approved Board Policy 2004 (board member communications), striking a contested paragraph and adopting the policy as amended by a recorded vote.
The Utah State Board of Education approved Board Policy 2004 (board member communications, draft 7) after debate over a provision that would require certain externally addressed policy correspondence to be routed through board leadership before broader distribution. The motion to approve the policy as amended passed by recorded vote: 12 yeses, 1 abstention, 1 no.
Board members debated whether routing correspondence through the board secretary or leadership improves transparency and accountability or creates delay and inhibits timely communications. Member Boggess asked why correspondence should be forwarded through the board secretary instead of being sent directly; "Can someone help me understand why we would forward it to the board secretary to be forwarded as opposed to just forwarding it?" she asked.
Supporters of the policy said centralized handling creates an auditable trail and reduces the risk of inadvertent serial communications among a quorum of board members. Deputy Superintendent Stallings told the board the forwarding practice "reduces the risk" that email exchanges could appear to be an impermissible group discussion among eight or more members.
Opponents argued the rule could impede urgent notifications to school employees or chill informal relations with elected officials. Member Reel urged caution about delays: "One of the most important things is you never get in the way of sending out a message to people that need to have timeliness on receiving that message. I do not ever want to get in the way of our school employees getting a message from board leadership if it is something, especially if it's timely." Member Davis suggested routine summaries or monthly updates from leadership as a way to increase transparency without strict routing requirements.
Action taken: The board approved Board Policy 2004, as amended to remove paragraph 4, and adopted the remaining provisions in draft 7. The final recorded vote on the amended policy was 12 yeses, 1 abstention and 1 no. The transcript identifies Member Reel as voting no; the transcript does not clearly record the individual who abstained on the final vote.
Next steps: With the policy adopted, board leadership and staff will implement the routing and reporting practices established in the amended policy and provide the board with routine updates as described during discussion.
