Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Reserve Bond Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cheltenham SD weighing borrowing as capital reserve falls short for Glenside and Cedar Brook additions

5924082 · September 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff said the district’s capital reserve is about $23 million but projected additions at Glenside and Cedar Brook could total roughly $30 million, prompting staff to outline a multi-step bond issuance plan and timetable starting this fall.

Cheltenham School District finance staff told the Financial Affairs Committee the district has nearly $23 million in its capital reserve but faces potential capital costs that exceed that balance, so borrowing would likely be needed for planned additions.

Mr. Swagger, a district staff member, said transfers from operating surpluses have built the capital fund to almost $23 million but projects such as the Glenside addition and the Cedar Brook addition are estimated to total about $30 million. “So we’re looking at borrowing, and we’re looking at a level of debt service we now have to build into our general,” Mr. Swagger said.

The nut graf: because the projected cost of near-term projects exceeds the capital reserve, staff presented sample bond structures and a timeline to begin underwriting work in September, review financing plans in October and adopt a bond-parameter resolution by Oct. 18.

Staff described a staged approach to issuing debt so the district does not incur interest costs while sitting on unused bond proceeds: select an underwriter and conduct a rating call in September; review financing plan Oct. 7; adopt a parameters resolution Oct. 18; and then set pricing and closing dates according to cash needs. Mr. Swagger suggested breaking a large issuance into smaller issues to better match cash draws and to “phase in our debt service.” He also presented a sample scenario in which one issuance would add about $688,000 annually to the general fund’s debt service.

Board members discussed how using capital reserves can avoid near-term interest expense but leave the district with less funding for unforeseen capital needs. One board member noted the need to preserve some reserve for emergencies; another pointed to long-term needs, saying the district will need substantial borrowing capacity around 2041 when the high school approaches the end of its usable life.

Staff said they will work with an underwriter, prepare a cash-drawdown schedule to match borrowing to project spending, and consider rating-call timing to optimize interest rates. No bond resolution or borrowing was approved at the meeting; the committee received the plan and directed staff to return with financing recommendations in the months ahead.

The committee also discussed capital projects already charged to the fund, including prior spending on a high-school fire-alarm replacement and a Cedarbrook settlement, and ongoing smaller facility refreshes such as hallway work at Elkins Park.

No formal board vote on borrowing took place at the meeting; the committee approved meeting minutes and then moved to other business.