Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boards Commissions Composition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council narrows preferred professions on Planning & Zoning Commission; ordinance passes 5-3
Summary
The council adopted an ordinance modifying the preferred composition of the Planning and Zoning Commission to limit any single 'preferred profession' (for example, licensed real estate agents) to a maximum of two members at the same time; the measure passed on a 5-3 vote after debate about board diversity and appointment practicality.
The City Council adopted Ordinance 24-25 on Oct. 8 to add preferred-composition guidance to the Planning and Zoning Commission, restricting any single preferred profession to no more than two simultaneous members.
Council member Long introduced the change and said it was intended to broaden the mix of perspectives on a land-use body that has, in his view, had a heavy representation from real estate practitioners. "In particular, there's a proliferation of realtors on the commission," Long said. "It limits the amount of any one profession to two while serving simultaneously on that board."
City Attorney comments to council characterized the language as a "preferred composition" and said it offers additional weight in recruiting candidates; it does not absolutely bar appointments outside the preferred list but sets a maximum number from any one preferred field.
Council debate focused on two points: whether the rule would unduly limit appointments if a particular recruitment cycle drew many applicants from the same field, and whether the provision would improve panel diversity. Council member Steinke argued for relying on the appointing body’s judgment, saying the eight council-appointed seats should have enough discretion to avoid professional over-concentration. Council member Lastra and others said the preferred composition is a deliberate step to diversify expertise on the land-use panel.
During public input one speaker objected that the change could penalize qualified applicants solely because of their profession. The ordinance passed on a 5-3 roll-call vote (ayes: Lastra, Lehman, Long, Donnell, Gunter; nays: Kilraane, Steinke, Kadook).
The change will take effect as provided in the ordinance language; staff told council there are current vacancies on the commission (four regular member vacancies and two alternates), and the new rule will be applied when reviewing applicants for those openings.
