Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cheltenham SD reports structural surplus but flags state budget timing, cyber-charter funding and grant uncertainty
Summary
Finance staff told the district's Financial Affairs Committee the district shows a structural surplus through February but cautioned that proposed changes to the state budget, timing of state disbursements and cyber-charter tuition rules could materially affect next year's revenue outlook.
At a Cheltenham School District Financial Affairs Committee meeting, district finance staff reported the district has a "strong cash position" through February and described the district as showing a structural surplus but warned several state-level changes and timing issues could affect next year's revenue.
The district's finance presenter said year-to-date expenditures are higher than last year, noting "having spent 84,700,000.0 this year to date versus 76.7 versus last year to date" and explaining part of the difference is an extra payroll cycle that added roughly $3,000,000 in salaries and wages. The presenter also cited curriculum purchases, pupil personnel services funded by PCCD school mental health grants and several large facilities projects — including the recent opening of EPIC and expanded repairs at Elkins Park — as reasons for higher expenditures this year.
The nut graf: State-source revenue represents about 21% of the district's revenue, the presenter said, so shifts in the governor's preliminary budget or the timing of state disbursements could materially change the district's near-term finances.
Finance staff reported $2.7 million more in revenues year to date compared with the same period last year, driven primarily by local real estate tax collections and higher state-authorized revenue lines that the district has begun to receive. The presenter noted investment earnings have risen as the district's cash position has strengthened, and delinquent-tax collections have improved.
Committee members pressed staff on specific cost drivers. Charles Burdell Wood asked about transportation contract increases; staff answered that the district's most recent contract had an initial 10% increase the first year and represented roughly a 4% increase year over year thereafter, lower than some neighboring districts experiencing double-digit jumps. Ross Wenning and others credited district negotiators for limiting transportation cost growth compared with some other districts.
The committee discussed several state-level items the presenter said to watch, including a proposed move to a flat $8,000 charter-school tuition formula and larger allocations to the Ready to Learn block grant and property-tax relief (the homestead fund). The presenter referenced a recent performance audit by the Pennsylvania Auditor General finding cyber-charter school revenues and fund balances had grown substantially, and noted that some cyber-charter fund balances exceed $100 million; the presenter said that reality is driving renewed interest in tuition reform and oversight.
Finance staff cautioned that timing is uncertain: if Pennsylvania's final budget is passed after the district adopts its budget (a common outcome when the state passes its budget after June 30), the district cannot count that money until the following fiscal year without a year-end resolution. Committee members said that has produced volatility and complicates planning despite optimistic preliminary numbers in the governor's proposal.
Ending: The committee did not take a formal vote on budget changes at the meeting; staff said they will continue monitoring state action and will return to the committee with updates and any proposals for adjustments when the timing and amounts are confirmed.
