Become a Founder Member Now!

Caregivers describe years of unpaid wages and threats; advocates press city for enforcement tools

October 10, 2025 | Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Caregivers describe years of unpaid wages and threats; advocates press city for enforcement tools
Caregivers, community organizers and a public‑health researcher told the Labor and Workforce Development Committee that wage theft in caregiving is common, underreported and concentrated among immigrant women who face language and immigration‑status vulnerabilities.

Tita Maria, a long‑time caregiver who testified through an interpreter, said she provided full care for five residents at a care home and did cleaning, cooking, bathing, medication administration and heavy lifting. She and organizers said her pay stubs reported a salaried classification but did not reflect the monthly amount shown in a contract; organizers said she received checks that at times totaled about $1,000 when a contract indicated $2,500 per month.

Advocates documented other local examples they said involved unpaid board, underpayment at memory‑care homes and retaliation when workers complain. Organizers told the committee that one employer "threatened to get her deported if she doesn't stop," a remark offered in testimony as an account of employer retaliation.

Dr. Aileen Deltilau, a public‑health research scientist and epidemiologist who presented research with the panel, said wage theft among caregivers is understudied at the city and state level and that enforcement limitations at BOLI make remedies difficult. "The issue isn't necessarily that Oregon... doesn't have strong policy. We don't have strong enforcement of our policy," she told the committee.

Policy options discussed included a caregiver‑specific "bill of rights," targeted outreach and education in multiple languages, an enforcement coordinator or capacity within the auditor’s or Office of Equity and Human Rights, and anti‑retaliation protections. Committee members asked advocates to help draft ordinance language and suggested field visits, outreach through community chambers of commerce and partnerships with immigrant business organizations.

Committee members did not vote on legislation Thursday. Several councilors said they would pursue staff options for drafting enforceable local rules and to explore whether existing city offices or budget reallocations could add enforcement capacity or community‑based deputization.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Oregon articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI