This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Lapeer City Downtown Development Authority members voted to recognize removal of language referencing a Brownfield area from the authority’s development plan.
The change follows the city commission’s approval of the DDA’s development plan renewal and reflects that the parcel identified as the Brownfield — the former White Junior High property — has been demolished and no longer generates eligible Brownfield expenses, a staff presenter said. The presenter added the Brownfield program included a five‑year limit to begin capture or to use incremental tax capture for eligible expenses.
The Brownfield language appeared in the TIF (tax increment finance) section of the plan and specifically referenced demolition and removal as eligible uses. Because that work is already complete and the statutory or program window for capture elapsed, the DDA moved to remove the Brownfield reference so the plan reflects current conditions.
A motion to remove that designation was made, supported and carried at the meeting. The vote was taken by voice; no roll‑call tally was provided in the transcript.
Why it matters: removing an inapplicable Brownfield reference narrows the plan to projects that can actually be funded through tax increment capture and avoids listing ineligible or already‑completed activities as future uses of TIF revenues. The board’s action is a record‑level recognition of that technical change; the presenter said the city commission had already approved the development plan renewal that omits the Brownfield language.
What remains: no additional action on funding or a substitute project was adopted at the meeting. Board members discussed that the Brownfield language would likely have been missed unless someone reviewed the Brownfield plan specifically, and they noted the removal was largely a housekeeping correction tied to the property’s demolition and the five‑year capture limitation.
Meeting context: the item was presented during the executive committee update and the motion passed by voice vote without a recorded division of ayes and nays.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,055 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit