Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Senate takes up bill to ban taxpayer‑funded lobbying by political subdivisions; debate centers on local control and definitions

August 18, 2025 | Senate, Legislative, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate takes up bill to ban taxpayer‑funded lobbying by political subdivisions; debate centers on local control and definitions
Senate Bill 13 would prohibit political subdivisions and other local public entities from using public funds to pay for lobbying activities. Sponsor Senator Middleton framed the bill as ending ‘‘taxpayer‑funded lobbying’’ and said the practice uses public dollars to lobby against taxpayers’ wishes.

Sponsor argument and procedural outcome
Middleton argued the practice is ‘‘forced speech’’ and cited examples where local associations allegedly opposed local elected officials’ positions; he characterized the measure as restoring ‘‘the voice of our taxpayers.’’ The Senate suspended the rules to take up SB 13 and passed second‑reading procedural votes (roll calls recorded 18 ayes, 12 nays) and passed the bill to engrossment in that form.

Key questions and floor amendments
Senators raised questions on definitions (which entities qualify as political subdivisions), whether charter schools and certain associations would be covered and whether the ban would interfere with contractual obligations. Several floor amendments were proposed: an amendment to include open‑enrollment charter schools failed; other amendments seeking to preserve existing contracts or to rely on the Texas Ethics Commission for enforcement failed; an amendment to allow local governing‑body approval of expenditures also failed.

Supporters vs. critics
Supporters said associations can continue to exist and that the bill targets public funding for professional, registered lobbyists rather than citizen advocacy. Critics — including county officials and senators from larger jurisdictions — warned the bill could remove an efficient, pooled means for smaller counties and cities to monitor legislation, forcing individual officials to travel to Austin or rely on paid private interests for representation.

Ending
SB 13 passed second‑reading maneuvers and was sent to engrossment; the transcript shows several proposed amendments and recorded procedural votes. The debate highlighted a tradeoff between preventing use of public funds for paid lobbyists and preserving coordinated representation by associations that serve local governments.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI