Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Law Prosecution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate restores obligation for attorney general to prosecute certain election offenses, citing past statute and courtroom testimony
Summary
Senate Bill 12, imposing a duty on the Texas attorney general to prosecute criminal offenses under the state's election laws, passed on third reading after defenders argued the change restores long-standing authority and proponents cited sworn testimony of election-worker misconduct.
The Texas Senate voted to restore the attorney general’s duty to prosecute certain election-law offenses, approving Senate Bill 12 on third reading by an 18-12 vote.
Senator Hughes, speaking in favor, said the 1985 statute once granted the attorney general this authority and argued the change addresses instances where local prosecutors have conflicts or decline to pursue election offenses. Hughes read sworn testimony from a trial transcript describing an alleged incident in which a paid election worker improperly cast a voter’s ballot, using that example to illustrate the need for statewide prosecutorial authority.
Opponents framed the measure as part of a wider trend restricting access to voting and said the timing and focus of the bill were misplaced given other pressing issues. Senator Eckhart called the bill "yet another in a line of bills designed to suppress the vote," and raised concerns about recent local election-administration changes in Tarrant County.
Why it matters: supporters said the attorney general’s authority fills gaps when local prosecutors have conflicts of interest; opponents said shifting prosecution authority could be used to suppress voting or be applied inconsistently.
Senator Hughes cited Article 4, Section 22 of the Texas Constitution to support placing prosecutorial duties on the attorney general. After floor debate, the Senate recorded 18 ayes and 12 nays and declared final passage.
