Commissioners discuss draft opioid settlement program: $175,000/year proposal for community-service deputy and $25,000 grants pool

5913727 · September 3, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County leaders discussed a proposed five-year opioid settlement spending plan that would fund a community-service deputy position at roughly $175,000 per year (salary, training and operations) and reserve $25,000 annually for community grant awards. The board did not finalize the policy and directed staff to return with a refined proposal.

Baker County commissioners discussed a proposed policy for allocating opioid-settlement funds at the Sept. 3, 2025 meeting and asked staff to refine the plan for formal action at a future session.

The draft presented designates a county community-service deputy (identified in the meeting as Gabe Maldonado) as a primary recipient, with proposed funding to cover salary, training and operating costs. The presenter suggested an illustrative figure of $175,000 per year to fund the deputy for five years; that amount would include salary and program operating costs. The draft also allocates a $25,000-per-year grant pool for community organizations and advised an application-review process for one annual award round timed to align with county budgeting.

Commissioners discussed the review process and potential membership for a small oversight/review panel. The discussion favored a compact review group of an odd number of reviewers to avoid tie votes; suggested members included a commissioner or commissioner designee, a health-department representative (or designee), and an external community representative such as a 5J representative or another community agency. Commissioners emphasized the need to avoid conflicts of interest by excluding direct recipients or program staff from the review panel.

No formal vote was taken; the board directed staff to place a refined policy, application template and review committee recommendation on a near-term agenda (the board discussed returning the item for consideration on Sept. 10).

Ending Staff will prepare a final draft policy, an application form and a recommended review panel membership for the board to consider at a future meeting, including reporting requirements for recipients.