A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Residents press Tuolumne supervisors to investigate alleged county water‑line tap by Supervisor Mike Holland; Holland says hydrant donated to county

October 07, 2025 | Tuolumne County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Residents press Tuolumne supervisors to investigate alleged county water‑line tap by Supervisor Mike Holland; Holland says hydrant donated to county
Several residents used the Oct. 7 public comment period at the Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors meeting to call for an investigation into allegations that Supervisor Mike Holland tapped a Tuolumne County or Tuolumne Utility District (TUD) water line for a private construction project.

Christopher Butner, a self‑described community journalist, urged the county to investigate what he said were credible allegations that "Supervisor Holland" tapped a county or TUD water line for a private company project and called for accountability and law‑enforcement review. Another speaker asked the board to investigate alleged misconduct and warned the grand jury might review the matter.

In his board report, Supervisor Holland responded directly. He said he had discussed installing a fire hydrant on the county water line for the project more than two years earlier and that then‑county administrator Tracy Riggs had given permission. Holland characterized the installed hydrant as a public one that the property owner had donated — "a private citizen donate[d] over a $10,000 fire hydrant to the county," he said — and said county records document the arrangement.

Board counsel reminded the room that public comment is not the time for supervisors to engage in protracted discussion of items raised during oral communications; several supervisors later indicated they would address the topic during board reports rather than during public comment.

No formal investigation, motion or vote occurred at the meeting. Multiple members of the public continued to call for investigation; the board did not direct staff at the meeting to open an inquiry.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal