Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hr Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Buncombe County HR previews conflict‑of‑interest, secondary‑employment and travel policy updates; votes planned Oct. 21
Summary
Human Resources staff briefed commissioners on revisions to the conflict‑of‑interest policy, a new secondary‑employment policy, a separation policy update and a travel policy rewrite; three policies will be presented for approval at the county's Oct. 21 meeting and an annual disclosure will be implemented in November.
Get email alerts on the Hr Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Amy Davis, employee relations manager in Buncombe County Human Resources, presented proposed policy revisions and one new policy to commissioners and said three policies will be brought for approval at the Oct. 21 regular meeting.
Davis reviewed the conflict‑of‑interest policy revisions, which streamline definitions, centralize required disclosures, and shift oversight to an employee's chain of command; secondary employment language was removed and moved into a new standalone secondary‑employment policy. She said the separation policy was clarified for voluntary and involuntary separations and that the grant‑funded positions policy was updated with housekeeping edits and clarified responsibilities for supervisors, directors and HR.
On the new secondary‑employment policy, Davis said the county will use a broad definition that covers gig work, independent contracting and other paid work outside county employment; employees must request advance approval and disclose secondary employment during the annual disclosure process. When asked whether existing secondary work will need to be disclosed, Davis said the county intends to roll disclosures into the annual process beginning in November.
HR also presented a rewritten travel policy intended to increase clarity and consistency in travel booking, allowable expenses and reimbursement; staff said the travel policy was last updated in 2018 and that the draft aligns with vehicle usage and flexible workplace policies. The travel policy is a staff‑awareness item now and will be included in materials ahead of the Oct. 21 meeting. Commissioners asked whether county employee policies apply to the Board; staff replied that the board can opt to apply employee policies to commissioners when formally adopting a policy.
No vote occurred at the briefing. Davis asked commissioners to review the documents in the board packet prior to Oct. 21, when staff will request approval of three policies.

