Committee hears update on community-center feasibility study; consultants to brief council Oct. 6

5914599 · October 8, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff and consultants outlined a feasibility study and community outreach plan for a potential new community center, including bilingual surveys, kiosks at the senior center and library, pop-up events, a $99,000 feasibility contract (not funded from Measure W), and an October 6 council study-session presentation.

Cathedral City staff told the Finance Advisory Committee that a community-center feasibility study is underway and that consultants will present preliminary findings to the City Council during a study session on Oct. 6.

Anne (city staff) and the consultant team described the work program: demand assessment, identification of candidate sites, comparison of adaptive reuse versus new construction, high-level construction and renovation cost ranges, operational-cost considerations and options for phasing. Staff said the study timeline began in late July/early August and will extend through December.

The outreach plan includes a bilingual online survey (English and Spanish), paper surveys on request, and mobile kiosks currently at the senior center and library. Staff reported the consultants and city will attend community events — including a Movies in the Park event on Oct. 7 and a spooktacular event — and that consultants will also conduct stakeholder meetings at schools and community locations. At the Hispanic heritage block party staff said in-person boards were used to let participants place dots indicating preferred activities and spaces.

Staff noted the feasibility contract is for about $99,000 and the funds for that contract come from outside Measure W. The study will present ballpark per-square-foot construction and renovation cost ranges, and staff said subsequent council discussion will include realistic sizing and phasing options aligned with available Measure W dollars, potential bond proceeds and outside grants.

The committee discussed facility priorities voiced during outreach so far — multi-generational spaces, adaptable or movable-wall rooms, social/dining areas, athletic courts (pickleball, indoor courts), an indoor walking track, and bilingual signage. Staff also raised resiliency uses such as a cooling/warming center or emergency resource location as potential grant-eligible elements.

Staff invited committee members to the October 6 study session and said the consultant team will return with top scenarios for council and community review; no formal funding decisions were made at the committee meeting.