Become a Founder Member Now!

Audit review: USBE personnel management report presented to committee; staff to consider recommendations

November 11, 2024 | Utah State Board of Education, Utah Education, State Agencies, Organizations, Utah Executive Branch, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Audit review: USBE personnel management report presented to committee; staff to consider recommendations
USBE’s Internal Audit Division presented its personnel‑management audit to the Law & Licensing Committee and discussed high‑level findings related to the agency’s control environment, organizational structure and staff workload.

Chief Audit Executive Debbie Davis and Deputy Audit Executive Kevin John summarized the audit’s approach: the team combined surveys, interviews and document review to examine whether the board’s control environment and personnel systems support organizational objectives. The audit highlighted several themes, including how matrixed work (project‑based assignments that draw staff outside hierarchical lines) affects accountability; supervisor clarity about critical functions; and workload patterns, including seasonality tied to the legislative session and spikes in project work.

Audit staff pointed to several data points: a substantial share of supervisors reported difficulty effectively communicating critical functions; a portion of employees indicated they do not feel comfortable raising concerns up their supervisory line; turnover data from 2021–2023 showed notable staff movement; and a variety of leave and overtime practices merited review. Committee members asked how audit results should be used: to inform management priorities, to guide requests for additional staff, or to shape board oversight metrics. Auditors said their role is to provide objective data and risk assessments; decisions about corrective actions, resource requests and policy changes rest with management and the board.

Committee members requested additional detail in several areas (for example, frequencies of particular survey responses and trends over time) and asked staff to provide specific personnel‑related metrics the board could receive on a recurring basis. The committee did not take formal action on the audit report but asked staff to return with follow‑up information and to consider whether board‑level personnel reporting would assist governance and legislative advocacy.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

Excel Chiropractic
Excel Chiropractic
Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI