Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Recycling topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board delays recycling contract decision, asks staff to seek 3- and 4-week service bids
Summary
After an extended hearing and questions about rural vs. city service levels, the county board voted to postpone awarding the recycling contract and directed staff to request additional cost options including countywide every‑4‑week and every‑3‑week service scenarios.
Kandiyohi County commissioners on Oct. 7 postponed taking a final vote on new recycling contract bids and asked staff to obtain additional pricing options before awarding a multi‑year contract.
Environmental Services Director Gary Geer presented two bids from West Central Sanitation and Donna Taylor (listed in the packet) offering different service levels: bid 1 was a status‑quo plan (city biweekly, rural every four weeks) while bid 2 proposed countywide biweekly service. Staff initially recommended maintaining the current level of service, but the presentation prompted lengthy commissioner discussion about cost, equity between city and rural taxpayers, equipment size and service frequency.
Commissioners pressed staff on operational details: rural routes cover roughly 2,200 miles compared with about 675 miles of city routing, a discrepancy presenters said explains much of the price difference. Commissioners asked for alternative bids that mirror rural service levels across the entire county (every four weeks), and asked how three‑week schedules would affect routing and efficiency.
Commissioner concerns: Some commissioners said moving cities to four‑week service could save substantial levy dollars (a back‑of‑envelope estimate of roughly $232,000 was mentioned) while others said residents strongly value the existing curbside program and cautioned against a sudden reduction in service. Several asked for options tailored to apartments and multi‑unit housing.
Board action: The board voted to postpone the award and directed staff to seek additional cost information — including proposals for countywide every‑4‑week service and every‑3‑week service — and to return the item to the board as soon as contractors can supply the pricing. The motion to postpone carried after a motion and second; the chair said staff would attempt to bring options back for the next meeting if possible.
Why it matters: The recycling contract is a multi‑year procurement with direct levy implications and an operational footprint across the county’s cities and rural townships. Commissioners emphasized the need to balance service levels, taxpayer cost and route efficiency before committing to a new contract.
