Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rockville Centre outlines K–12 curriculum changes, emphasizes literacy and applied learning
Summary
At a Sept. 18 public work session the Rockville Centre Union Free School District presented districtwide curriculum updates in ELA, social studies, math and science, highlighting literacy initiatives, new course offerings, state-aligned revisions and expanded partnerships with local colleges and cultural organizations.
Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Rockville Centre Union Free School District presented a districtwide curriculum update at its Sept. 18 public work session, outlining changes in English language arts, social studies, mathematics and science and describing new partnerships and professional learning the district plans to use to implement the changes.
The update was led by Liz Nissler and Guy Accardi, who reviewed work underway across grade levels and the district’s approach to continuous improvement. Nissler framed the work around the district’s continuous‑improvement cycle and said, “Continuous improvement always drives our work.” She described coordinated efforts to build common curricular units, expand teacher training and use assessment data to guide instruction.
Why it matters: District leaders said the work aims to align instruction with New York State expectations while strengthening students’ reading, writing and reasoning across subjects. The presenters said the changes are intended to increase student independence and stamina in reading and writing, support conceptual learning in social studies, and shift science and math instruction toward student inquiry and problem solving.
Key changes and initiatives
- Literacy and writing: Nissler said the district is adopting Writing Revolution strategies across grades and content areas to give teachers a common language and approach for building student writing stamina and clearer constructed responses. Elementary teachers and some middle‑ and high‑school staff have completed online training; principals have set aside professional‑development time to implement the work.
- Social studies: The district is in year two of a social‑studies curriculum review and has added AP Human Geography as a new offering for ninth graders; Nissler said the AP Human Geography course was developed over the summer by three teachers. The district is revising Global 9 and exploring AP World for 10th grade to ensure conceptual alignment and to create pathways between Global 9, AP Human Geography and the IB sequence in grades 11–12.
- Mathematics: Accardi outlined multi‑year alignment to New York State mathematics refinements (Next Gen/clarifications to Common Core). The district is piloting Ready, Set, Math with 15 teachers for grades 3–4, embedding Building Thinking Classrooms at K–8, and planning IB math curriculum writing in 2027. Accardi noted the district is using writing strategies in math instruction to strengthen students’ ability to explain reasoning.
- Science: This school year is a formal review year for science. Accardi described newly written biology and earth/space curricula, expanded professional learning around New York State science investigations and the use of an assessment platform (Inner Orbit) that mirrors the three‑dimensional science framework. He said grade 5 science assessment results rose “nearly 20%” year over year, and the district will extend investigation training to chemistry and physics next year.
Partnerships and enrichment
District leaders highlighted several partnerships and grants they said support the curricular work: Benner’s Farm colonial experiences for fourth graders, funding from the Rockville Centre Education Foundation to bring author Kate Cleese to elementary students, a New York Historical Society educator residency funded by a grant, college partnerships that allow students to earn college credits or certifications (Hofstra and Molloy University), and consulting relationships to support classroom shifts.
Board discussion and next steps
Board members asked about assessment changes, whether literacy demands are appearing earlier on state tests, and how the district will gather broader student and parent feedback on instructional changes. Presenters said they will continue to collect and analyze both quantitative and anecdotal data and will engage building teachers and PTA curriculum committees in the review. Officials said they plan to report follow‑up findings as the review proceeds and to expand internal capacity so external consultants can be tapered once teacher leaders are trained.
Less urgent details and forward look
District leaders said they will continue to refine units, monitor pilot programs and provide updates to the board. Accardi and Nissler said the work is intended to produce measurable changes in classroom practice and student outcomes, and to inform grant applications and partnerships to support new programming.

