Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Jazz Arena Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends approval for Jazz Arena parking garage with conditions after tense debate and commissioner recusal
Summary
The Planning Commission voted 5–2 on Aug. 13 to recommend City Council approve a development agreement to build a seven‑story, 452‑space parking garage at the Delta Center, subject to conditions on ground‑floor treatments, screening and bicycle parking.
Get email alerts on the Jazz Arena Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Salt Lake City Planning Commission on Aug. 13 voted 5–2 to recommend City Council approve a zoning amendment and development agreement to build a seven‑story parking structure serving the Delta Center/arena block, with conditions that the applicant add visual interest at the ground-floor retaining walls, consider a different screening material at the base, provide bicycle parking and supply final site details before adoption.
Planning Manager John Anderson told the commission the proposed structure would reach roughly 89 feet at its tallest point and provide about 452 parking stalls. The proposal would use a development agreement to modify downtown design standards that otherwise require active ground-floor uses on street-facing facades.
Jim Oates, president of the Utah Jazz and an executive with Smith Entertainment Group, said the project is timed to support the arena’s fall schedule. "We will be welcoming patrons back to the arena in early October. October 2 is our first NHL hockey game of the year," Oates said, describing the immediate need for a covered podium over the existing below‑grade loading and parking area.
The team and its engineers argued the lower-level loading area needs open screening for ventilation and to avoid noise issues from large exhaust fans; engineer Saeed Banyadi of Walter P. Moore cautioned that some perforated-panel designs can produce a "whistling" effect and said the open-mesh option supports ventilation. Oates also said traffic studies and a coordinated plan with Salt Lake City Police Department would allow the garage to be emptied quickly after events; the applicant estimated it could clear the garage in about 30 minutes under the proposed egress and traffic-management plan.
Several commissioners pressed the applicant and staff on ground-floor activation and pedestrian experience. Staff found the proposed base — a primarily open airspace for loading and parking — would not meet downtown active‑ground‑floor standards if designed exactly as submitted, and recommended conditions to add visual interest and to consider extending the perforated-aluminum screening down to better screen the loading area.
The commission also debated a requested 43‑foot curb cut (the code maximum is 30 feet). Transportation staff said they had reviewed the plan and were comfortable with the proposed design after revisions; the applicant noted Salt Lake City Police would assist with traffic control at events.
Early in the hearing Commissioner Mike Christiansen disclosed prior social‑media comments about the aesthetics of the proposed garage. The commission voted 4–2 with one abstention to require Christiansen’s recusal from the discussion on the parking‑garage application. Commissioners explained the action as an appearance issue rather than a finding of bias; Christiansen left and returned after the item.
On motions before the commission, Commissioner Lila Rosenfield moved to recommend denial, citing concerns about adding substantial parking downtown and about traffic at the Delta interlocking near the site; that motion failed. Commissioner Michael Vela later moved to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council consistent with staff’s conditions and with added direction that the applicant work with staff on the retaining-wall treatment and with Transportation on bicycle parking; Commissioner Landon Krasick seconded. The commission voted 5 in favor and 2 opposed; commissioners recorded the recommendation for approval with conditions.
The recommendation to council is not the final decision; Council will consider the development‑agreement ordinance and final site plan. Staff will work with the applicant on the condition items — additional ground-floor visual interest along retaining walls, consideration of screening materials to improve screening and reduce visual impacts, inclusion of bicycle parking near the arena entrance, and final site-plan details prior to council action.

