Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
High Springs commission approves tentative millage, adopts FY2025-26 budget and several rate and contract measures
Summary
At its Sept. 8 meeting the High Springs City Commission set a tentative millage rate of 6.99, adopted the FY2025-26 budget, approved a sewer rate increase and other fee changes, and awarded multiple contracts and approvals tied to capital and grant projects.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The High Springs City Commission on Sept. 8 approved a package of budget, tax-rate, utility-rate and contract measures intended to close projected operating gaps and keep federally funded projects moving.
At a public hearing the commission set a tentative millage rate of 6.99 mills for fiscal year 2025–26, up from a rolled-back rate of 6.3438, and later adopted the city’s FY2025–26 budget by ordinance after a first public hearing. The commission also approved a separate resolution implementing sewer-rate and meter-fee changes and a set of contract and project authorizations tied to grants and capital repairs.
The millage decision and the budget vote came after staff presentations showing the city’s revenue and expense drivers: rising property valuations (which produced the rolled-back comparison), a $6.20 sewer shortfall in a prior year, a roughly $103,000 fire budget pressure, higher pension (FRS) costs and a 5% rise in health insurance premiums. Finance Director Diane Wilson described the 6.99 proposed tentative millage and explained the rolled-back calculation during the hearing.
Votes at a glance
- Resolution 2025-K (tentative millage 6.99): Approved (roll call recorded as unanimous). Motion to accept the resolution as read was made and seconded; roll-call votes recorded in the minutes show Mayor Tristan Grunder, Vice Mayor Miller, Commissioner Bloodsworth, Commissioner Howell and Commissioner White voting yes.
- Ordinance 2025-05 (adopt FY2025–26 budget, first hearing held and ordinance read into the record; final reading scheduled Sept. 22): Motion to approve ordinance 2025-05 was made and seconded; roll-call vote recorded as unanimous approval at first reading.
- Resolution 2025-M (utility-rate changes including a $24.25 monthly increase to sewer customers, new hydrant-meter deposit/fees and adjusted water/sewer impact fees): Approved (roll call recorded as unanimous). The measures include a $24.25 monthly increase to sewer customers, a proposed hydrant-meter deposit increase and a $40 monthly hydrant-meter charge with a $3.80 per 1,000-gallon irrigation-style commodity rate for outdoor use; impact fees proposed to change from $250 to $500 for water and from $2,120 to $2,400 for sewer for new connections (staff noted a typo in initial packet and confirmed the $2,400 figure).
- First amendment to the interlocal agreement with Alachua County for fire suppression and EMS/rescue services (mutual-aid payments at $865 per call): Approved (motion seconded and approved by vote).
- Award of Priest Theatre roof and structure repair to Hoffman Construction (per staff recommendation and engineer review): Approved by voice vote; work subject to State Architect review due to historic restrictions.
- Request for qualifications (RFQ) for engineering services tied to a $700,000 CDBG stormwater grant (with $50,000 local match from contingency): Authorized to be released.
- Resolution 2025-O (contract award to KCT Consulting Services for land-development-code rewrite, $90,000 flat fee, one-year term with six-month buffer): Approved (minutes record the motion passing 4–1).
- Waiver of city costs for Operation Douglas Warriors special-event permit and approval of related city support tasks: Approved.
- Temporary suspension of the city’s alcohol-consumption ordinance for the Hot Rodding for Heroes one-day event: Approved.
- Letter to Winn-Dixie corporate urging preservation of the High Springs Winn-Dixie location rather than conversion to Aldi: Approved (commission voted to send the drafted letter).
Why it matters
The package of votes affects recurring revenue and household costs: staff estimated the millage change and the utility/assessment changes together will alter household bills (finance staff gave an illustrative example of roughly $75 per year on an assumed $300,000 home for the millage increase and said the sewer/utility decisions average roughly $2.91 per household per month in a prior calculation). Several votes also authorize spending tied to grants (a CDBG stormwater grant and a state historic preservation grant for the Priest Theatre) that require timetables, state approvals and use-restrictions. Commissioners and staff noted the city’s limited reserves in enterprise funds (sewer, solid waste) and discussed selling city properties as one-time revenue to rebuild reserves.
What commission members said
Finance Director Diane Wilson summarized the technical calculations for the millage and the budget lines and answered commissioners’ questions about enterprise-fund reserves, personnel impacts and grant-related revenues. Commissioners asked for clarification about the use and timing of one-time asset-sale proceeds, the effect of upcoming garbage-contract negotiations on the solid-waste reserve projection, and whether previously approved grants (for wastewater projects) would grandfather older impact-fee rates for applicants; staff said they would check specifics on grandfathering.
The commission set a final budget hearing for Sept. 22, 2025, when it will take a final vote on the millage and adopt the budget ordinance at second reading. In the meantime, line-item changes can still be made by commission vote through routine budget amendments, staff reminded the commission.
Ending
The commission’s votes keep grant-funded projects moving and set the tax and budget framework the city will use for FY2025–26, while staff and commissioners signaled continued follow-up on enterprise reserves, contract negotiations (solid waste, police dispatch/contract issues), and the technical review of the LDC rewrite contract deliverables.

