Council to study lost-pet protocols after members cite rising costs and gaps

5933956 · October 7, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After members and residents reported many lost-pet posts on social media and limited shelter capacity, council voted to refer a study of animal-control options and public education to committee of the whole for further work.

Council discussed a pattern of lost-pet posts on social media and whether the city should explore additional drop-off or temporary holding options for animals found by residents on weekends and off-hours.

Councilmember Toye raised the idea of providing a formal drop-off point or quick-turn shelter option for lost animals when animal control is not available. Councilmember Morgan and others described existing stopgaps, including the police department temporarily holding animals until animal control can respond and an existing contract with the Michigan Humane Society for sheltering.

Councilman Nower reported the city currently pays roughly $11,000 a month to Michigan Humane Society for holding lost animals—costs he said exceed $100,000 per year—and said the expense has spurred interest in regional cooperation and alternative approaches.

After discussion, council agreed to study the matter in committee of the whole so staff can return with options, including public education about current procedures, possible drop-off locations, volunteer or partner solutions, and estimated costs.