Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Council seeks clarity on parks funds and $2 per-bill surcharge after budget questions

August 18, 2025 | La Marque, Galveston County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council seeks clarity on parks funds and $2 per-bill surcharge after budget questions
La Marque council members used the budget workshop to press staff for clearer accounting of several distinct revenue streams that support parks work: maintenance and operations (M&O) from the general fund, the city's voluntary one-dollar donation program, a $2 per water-bill park surcharge, and project funds in the capital-improvement program (CIP).

Mayor Pro Tem and several council members asked why the $2-per-water-bill surcharge did not appear in the draft budget summaries shown in the meeting packet. Staff said the surcharge is typically tracked as special revenue and noted the packet included the line in a different section; the city manager said she would confirm and return with reconciled numbers.

Parks board members and a parks liaison explained the customary uses for each pool of money: the M&O general fund covers routine maintenance such as mowing and bench repair; the voluntary donation fund (resident contributions) is generally used for small equipment and event support; the CIP covers larger capital repairs and replacement (for example, major playground or field work); and the $2-per-bill surcharge was originally intended to accumulate toward a larger parks overhaul and to act as a local funding match for grant applications.

Council asked staff to present the consolidated fund balances and to make the parks-board recommendation and expenditure process more transparent and consistent. "Let's allocate the $20,000 and have them identify uses and come back with a list," one council member suggested; staff indicated they would carry forward a park-project allocation and could increase the council-allocated amount if the council wished.

Council also asked for quarterly updates from boards and departments so council can track progress on projects funded from these special revenue sources.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI