Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff member cites 2022 GIS data and school references, invokes “sect 22” during meeting segment

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A staff member referenced a 2022 GIS dataset and multiple school-related names and 2020 timestamps, and mentioned “sect 22” as an authority. The meeting transcript records no formal motion or vote tied to those remarks.

A staff member cited a 2022 geographic-information-system (GIS) dataset and several school-related names during a recorded meeting segment, and referred to “sect 22” as an authority, according to the meeting transcript.

The staff member said, verbatim: "2022 GIS. Queenschool, trofy gooos to WMS. Te gaan Grama, 2020 vijf:twaalf, 2020 vijf:dertien en 2020 vijf:veertien, als autoriteit bij sect 22 3000 miljoen bridal." The transcript does not identify the governing body for the meeting, the context for the remarks, or any formal action tied to them.

The comments appear to reference a 2022 GIS product and the names "Queenschool," "WMS," and "Grama," and record three 2020 timestamp-like references (noted in the transcript as "vijf:twaalf," "vijf:dertien" and "vijf:veertien"). The speaker also invoked "sect 22" as an authority and mentioned "3000 miljoen," but the transcript gives no additional detail about whether that number refers to currency, units, or an estimate.

No motions, votes, or staff directives associated with those remarks are recorded in the provided transcript segment. The meeting record likewise does not provide clarifying context such as the data source name, the jurisdiction for "sect 22," or the intended use of the GIS data and the school references.

Absent further information in the minutes or a fuller transcript, it is not possible to determine whether the speaker was reporting a factual finding, proposing an action, or summarizing prior materials.