Committee backs full no-parking on east side of Grand Street after residents cite blocked driveways and emergency access problems
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
After months of resident complaints and a public meeting filled with affected neighbors, the Transportation Committee voted to recommend a no-parking restriction along the east side of Grand Street from Merritt Avenue to Hudson Street, citing fire-code access and repeated incidents blocking driveways and snow removal.
The Transportation Committee voted unanimously on Oct. 13 to recommend prohibiting parking along the east side of Grand Street from Merritt Avenue to Hudson Street, following multiple public comments describing blocked driveways, impaired snow removal and emergency-vehicle access problems.
Staff described the problem area as a narrow one-way segment where existing no-parking signs left only limited curb access. Committee members reviewed photos and measurements presented by residents and staff. One resident, Chris Steinke of 520 Pleasant Street, said he had photographed a fire engine blocked by a parked car and cited state fire-code guidance that requires a minimum unobstructed width for emergency access. Steinke said curb-to-curb measurement at his driveway is about 17 feet 4 inches and that, “If there's any vehicle parked on this road, they can't get by.”
Multiple neighbors told the committee that parked cars on the east side impede trash pickup, snow removal and driveway access. Ruth Ann Burrell, who lives at 552 Grand, said the issue contributes to repeated neighborhood disputes and prevents reliable snow plowing. Jeff Elman of 514 Pleasant said the street's geometry and a utility pole near his driveway make it difficult to maneuver when cars park adjacent to driveways.
A committee member moved to prohibit parking the full length from Merritt to Hudson; the motion passed on roll call (Armstrong, Merrick, Hartman and Martin voting “aye”) and will go to the Common Council on Oct. 25. Staff told residents the council meeting will be the opportunity for additional public comment.
Why it matters: Committee members said emergency access and recurring operational problems (trash pickup, plowing, driveway access) justify the restriction. Residents said the change is necessary to protect access and safety; staff said the proposal balances neighborhood needs against limited on-street parking supply.
What comes next: The committee’s recommendation will be forwarded to the Common Council; staff noted interested residents may testify at the council meeting on Oct. 25.