Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State board approves instructional-materials operating procedures after debate over curriculum packets
Summary
The State Board approved R277-469, the instructional materials operating procedures (draft 2) on second and final reading. Discussion centered on whether locally produced curriculum "packets" would be vetted or overridden by state review; the rule was described as an optional pathway for LEAs to seek state approval.
Get email alerts on the Instructional Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The State Board of Education approved R277-469, the instructional materials operating procedures draft 2 on second and final reading, with 14 members voting in favor and one abstention from Member Vargas.
Board members said the rule clarifies how curriculum packets created by local education agencies (LEAs) may be submitted for state review and approval but does not require LEAs to use the state vetting process.
Board Chair Earl presented the motion, saying, “The motion before the board is that the board approves R277Dash469, instructional materials operating procedures draft 2 on second and final reading.” Member Lear questioned whether the draft language could be read to allow the board to override an LEA’s determination that a packet is curriculum rather than a state-approved instructional material. “So the LEA has approved the packet for use as an instructional material in accordance with, and it gives the statute,” Lear said, adding concern that the draft might be read to let the board “overcall the LEA when it’s a curriculum item.”
A staff member responding to the question said packets submitted through the state’s instruction-materials process would be included in the twice-yearly review window; if an LEA chose not to pursue state vetting, it could still use its own process. Cheryl, a staff member, noted the rule aligns with recently passed packet legislation and that the citation in the draft reflects that change.
The board did not amend R277-469 in this session. The motion passed with a recorded 14–0–1 vote (one abstention from Member Vargas).
The approval authorizes the state-level review pathway for LEA-created curriculum packets but, per staff explanation during debate, does not compel LEAs to submit local packets for that review.
The board returned to other committee business after the vote.

