Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

USD 368 presents first-year results from new state assessment; district outperforms state averages in ELA, math and science

October 07, 2025 | Paola, School Boards, Kansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

USD 368 presents first-year results from new state assessment; district outperforms state averages in ELA, math and science
District staff presented the first-year results from the state’s revised assessment and walked the board through district and grade‑level performance in English language arts (ELA), math and science. Staff characterized the results as a positive benchmark year.

Presenters said the state assessment was revised after a long gap and now measures students’ performance against grade‑level content standards only; the new cut scores and performance levels (level 1 = limited, level 2 = basic, level 3 = proficient, level 4 = advanced) were set with input from Kansas educators. Staff cautioned the board that the assessment is a snapshot of grade‑level mastery and is not primarily a longitudinal growth measure.

Key points staff reported:
- Districtwide, more than 51% of students scored at levels 3 or 4 in ELA compared with about 43–44% statewide. The district’s level‑1 percentages in ELA were significantly below the state average.
- In math, the district outperformed the state average on levels 3 and 4 in most grade levels and had lower level‑1 percentages across grade levels; the presenter noted district averages were higher than state averages in six of seven tested grade levels.
- Fifth‑ and eighth‑grade science averages were above state averages, with fewer students in level 1 and more in levels 3 and 4.

Staff emphasized the data will serve as a benchmark for future years. Board members asked about tracking growth across cohorts (e.g., whether a fourth‑grade cohort can be followed into fifth grade under the new design). Staff replied the new test measures grade‑level standards and is not structured as a direct growth measure; however, staff said disaggregated grade‑level trends can be examined and compared over time to infer progress.

Staff also noted the state will not set formal accountability targets for a year or two while it collects multiple years of data for the new assessment.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Kansas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI