Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Device Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews updated electronic‑device policy tied to state law; staff to consider separate employee policy
Summary
Committee reviewed revisions to the student electronic‑device policy to reflect state law that limits disciplinary removals for device possession and allows certain device use under documented plans; staff and legal counsel suggested creating a separate employee policy for adult device use and to align the regulation with the approved policy.
The policy committee reviewed updates to the electronic communication devices policy that staff said were required by state law and reviewed by legal counsel. The draft clarifies circumstances in which students can use devices under documented plans, outlines principal responsibilities for a bell‑to‑bell no‑device expectation, and states students cannot be suspended or expelled solely for possession of an electronic device.
Staff noted current regulations already address liability for lost or damaged devices and emergency exceptions. Sands Anderson advised that the employee‑use portion of the policy could be separated into a distinct staff policy; staff said the committee could keep the employee language in both sections but, if desired, they could pull a matching employee policy into the employee section to ensure congruent language.
Committee members discussed enforcement language and consistency across schools and departments. Staff recommended leaving the employee language in place for now so regulations remain aligned until a separate employee policy is drafted; afterwards they would revise regulations to match the final policies.
Why it matters: The changes reflect recent statutory guidance about discipline related to device possession, provide clarity on permissible device use under documented plans (for example IEP/504 or medical exceptions) and begin a discussion about a separate employee policy to avoid redundant or inconsistent language in the manual.
Next steps: Staff to keep the draft as presented to move the policy forward and return with an employee policy option and matched regulations for final board adoption.
