Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sidewalks Safe Routes To School topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee sends list of sidewalk, ADA and crosswalk needs to council; agrees to seek school-zone fixes
Summary
Estacada Traffic & Public Safety Committee voted unanimously to forward lists of sidewalk, crosswalk and ADA ramp needs for uptown (38 locations), downtown (39 locations) and 14 school-zone intersections to the City Council for follow-up and potential funding.
Get email alerts on the Sidewalks Safe Routes To School topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Estacada Traffic and Public Safety Committee voted 6-0 to forward its recommendations on sidewalk, crosswalk and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ramp needs to the City Council.
The committee approved sending three lists: 38 problem areas in “uptown” Estacada, 39 problem areas in the downtown area, and 14 intersections identified as school-safety priorities near Estacada High School. Committee members described the lists as a mix of missing crosswalk markings, faded stop bars, trip hazards, failing or missing ADA ramps and narrow sidewalks obstructed by poles or mailboxes.
Committee member Shirley moved to forward the three lists and committee member Mike seconded. After a short discussion about repair responsibility and code limits, the motion passed unanimously.
Committee members said the school-zone list is relatively compact and could be prioritized first because it includes 14 intersections needing pedestrian signage, painted crosswalks and, in some places, solar-powered flashing “pedestrian crossing” beacons with push buttons. The committee noted that some curb ramps do not meet wheelchair-accessible grades and that a few sidewalks are effectively impassable for residents using mobility devices because of crushed-rock driveways, large lips between surfaces, or severe root heave.
Members discussed the limits of city authority and the role of property owners in repairs. Committee members asked staff to research existing city codes and clarify which repairs are the city’s responsibility versus property-owner responsibility. The committee agreed to submit the packet of documented locations, each with photos included in the committee’s checklist, to the City Council for action and potential funding options.
The discussion also noted past smaller improvements—newer streets where sidewalks meet current standards—and contrasted those with much older sections of town where sidewalks date from mid-20th century construction.
Committee staff said the lists will be transmitted to council staff as an official recommendation so the council can consider funding or ordinance changes addressing maintenance responsibilities.
The committee’s action followed an on-site audit; members said they would return for a follow-up walk to capture any remaining items.
Votes at a glance: Motion to forward Uptown (38 areas), Downtown (39 areas) and School safety zone (14 areas) recommendations to the City Council — passed 6-0.

