Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Corrections Jail topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Peoria County board directs staff to begin targeted jail upgrades, prioritizing kitchen, mechanicals and mental-health changes
Summary
After reviewing a consultant's options that included a $200 million rebuild, the Peoria County Board endorsed starting design work on smaller, lower-cost improvements focused on the jail kitchen and laundry, building systems and mental-health accommodations.
The Peoria County Board on Thursday asked staff and the sheriff's office to begin pursuing design work for targeted repairs and upgrades at the county jail, prioritizing a new kitchen and laundry, replacement of aging mechanical systems and changes to better serve detainees with mental-health needs.
Board Chairman Phil Dillon said the direction follows a consultant's study that presented three options, including a full rebuild with a sticker price above $200 million and a midrange addition estimated at more than $100 million. "That third option was taken off the table" because it is not feasible for the county, Dillon said at the meeting.
Peoria County facilities director Melissa (last name not specified in the public transcript) told the board that the priority list emerged from meetings with the sheriff, facilities staff and the consulting team. She said work to keep the existing facility operational over the next 10 years could range from $22 million to $31 million, with an additional $7 million to $10 million for kitchen and laundry if those were addressed as part of a larger renovation. Those estimates came from the consultant report and were cited in the presentation.
Sheriff Sharon Watkins told the board he favors a phased approach focused first on the kitchen because it is undersized and in poor condition. "Our kitchen is right now one of the main things that needs the attention," Watkins said. He also emphasized staffing pressures and rising jail medical costs as constraints on what the county can pay now.
Melissa and the sheriff described several options under consideration: building a new kitchen and laundry outside the secure facility and connecting them after construction; repurposing underused spaces such as former day-release areas or gymnasium space; and grouping detainees with similar needs into specific pods to improve care and supervision.
Board members and staff said the full rebuild option is unlikely to gain voter support and pointed to demographic and criminal-justice trends that make adding long-term bed capacity uncertain. Instead, the board reached general agreement that staff should begin the design and procurement process for the prioritized repairs and upgrades, including preparing requests for qualifications or proposals for architecture and engineering work.
The board also discussed funding options. Members said they would explore reallocating existing public safety sales-tax revenue into a long-term capital fund, but acknowledged that most of that tax currently funds operations and staffing. Sheriff Watkins said he has roughly 15 vacant corrections positions and is hiring; he warned that operations costs (including jail medical care) are substantial.
The board asked staff to schedule facility tours of comparable jails and mental-health units for members and to return with a plan and cost estimates for the recommended phased work. No final contract award was made at the meeting; the board's action was direction to proceed with planning and design work.
The discussion followed a previous consultant study and two months of follow-up work by county staff, the sheriff, and outside advisors. Board members repeatedly cited the importance of selecting experienced firms and avoiding lowest-bid-only procurement for specialized jail work.
