Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Trees And Landscaping topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning and Zoning asks Environmental Advisory Board to distill tree ordinance changes into bullet points
Summary
The board asked the Environmental Advisory Board to produce concise bullet points clarifying proposed tree- and landscape-ordinance changes, and voted to request a succinct list so planners can draft code language with fewer ambiguities.
Members of the Melbourne Beach Planning and Zoning Board on Aug. 5 asked the Environmental Advisory Board (EAB) to condense its proposed changes to the town's tree and landscape rules into a short list of specific requests so the planning board can evaluate and, if appropriate, incorporate them into the land-development code.
Why it matters: The EAB's draft covers tree replacement, minimum plantings, arborist review and penalties for unauthorized removal of canopy trees. Board members said the draft as written mixes residential and commercial requirements, cites external "best-practices" documents not provided in the packet, and needs to be clarified into actionable items that fit within the town's code structure.
Planning and Zoning Member Dan Harper and other members urged the EAB to identify the top priorities in plain language'for example, distinct bullets for (1) new-construction requirements, (2) standards for remodels and additions and (3) rules to prevent unauthorized removal of mature canopy trees. Harper said an arborist review could be part of the process but that the ordinance should specify who bears that cost (Harper said the homeowner would be expected to pay the expense if an arborist review is required). "If you're going to have an arborist, the homeowner would have to bear that cost," a board member said during the meeting.
A public commenter who identified herself as Lisonbee Dennington urged the board not to delay action and said the EAB had already drafted detailed language. Another attendee, Bruce Larson, urged the board to protect legacy canopy trees but emphasized the ordinance must be enforceable.
The board passed a motion requesting the EAB distill its proposal into a half-dozen bullet points: (1) clear items for new construction, (2) a short list to prevent unauthorized removal of canopy trees, (3) who pays for arborist reviews, and (4) any recommended planting lists or invasive-species controls. The motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.
Next steps: The EAB will be asked to return with a concise list of priorities in plain language so the planning board can draft or adapt ordinance language and, if needed, consult the best-practices manual referenced under Florida law.
