Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Estacada council orders 20 mph pilot, radar signs and study after resident complaints on Oakview Lane
Summary
Following public comments and staff data, the Estacada City Council directed staff to reduce the posted speed on Southeast Oakview Lane to 20 mph, install radar feedback signs, and re-measure traffic after a 30-day adjustment period. Council discussed but did not immediately approve permanent traffic cushions; staff flagged legal risk for physical
The Estacada City Council directed staff to lower the posted speed on Southeast Oakview Lane from 25 to 20 miles per hour, install a radar feedback sign, and conduct a follow-up speed study 30 days after the changes are in place.
The council's action followed resident testimony asking for physical traffic calming on Oakview Lane and a staff report presenting automated speed data. Jim Moriarty, a resident who spoke during public comment, asked that the council approve speed cushions on Oakview Lane or, if they did not, reduce the limit to 20 mph. He told councilors: "If you decide not to approve the speed cushions ... please consider lowering the speed limit to 20 miles an hour on our street."
City staff reported that the 80th-percentile speed on the hill portion of Oakview Lane was 23 mph and that one vehicle in the sample reached 31 mph. Melanie (staff) summarized the traffic counts and the equipment used and told the council the data include uphill and downhill runs. "The 80 fifth percentile speed was 23 miles per hour, and the max speed on that hill was 1 car that went 31 miles an hour," Melanie said.
City Manager Peter Wagner advised caution before installing physical traffic-calming devices because of legal risk. Wagner said the insurer's guidance increases the city's exposure on slopes that exceed standard design limits: "It does pierce kind of our sovereign immunity. It does make it more likely that they would settle a case ..." He recommended testing a posted speed reduction first and documenting an objective, data-driven process before placing devices on slopes outside the city's design standards.
Council discussion settled on a compromise approach: reduce the posted speed to 20 mph, install a radar feedback sign, and then re-run speed data 30 days after installation to evaluate whether further mitigation is needed. Council members discussed an objective standard for future mitigation decisions and asked staff to apply the following thresholds: treat residential zones as triggered when the 80th-percentile speed is 3 mph or more above the posted limit and other zones when the 80th-percentile is 5 mph or more above the posted limit.
The council also asked staff to explore temporary, removable traffic cushions as a test option if the 20-mph posting and radar signs do not sufficiently slow speeds. Staff said they would investigate availability and safety ratings for temporary rubber devices and report back.
No formal roll-call motion to install permanent traffic cushions on Oakview Lane was recorded; councilors recorded consensus on the pilot steps described above and asked staff to return with results after the study period.
