Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs staff to develop permeable‑surface option to increase front‑yard lot coverage to 70%
Summary
Council approved staff work to add a possible 20% permeable front‑yard coverage option (raising allowable coverage from 50% to 70% under specified permeable materials) into the city’s landscape design guidelines and asked staff to return with design examples and implementation guidance.
The council directed staff to work with a landscape architect to draft changes to the recently adopted landscaping guidelines that would permit up to an additional 20% of front‑yard area to be used for vehicle storage or operable parking if the added area uses permeable or semi‑permeable materials.
Lede
Council voted unanimously to move forward with a staff proposal to allow an additional 20% of front‑yard lot coverage — raising the potential total from 50% to 70% — when permeable paving systems or equivalent treatments are used; staff will prepare guidance and draft guideline language for council review.
Nut graf
Staff said the proposal responds to recurring resident complaints about driveway space and on‑street parking pressure, while addressing stormwater runoff concerns by requiring permeable materials for the additional coverage. The landscape designer will produce examples, allowed materials, and implementation recommendations for inclusion in the landscaping standards.
What staff will do next
- Scope of change: The proposed change would retain the existing 50% base limit and allow an additional 20% of the front yard for operable vehicle storage only when constructed with permeable or semi‑permeable surfacing (examples include permeable pavers, grass‑crete, crushed aggregate with stabilizer or concrete with pervious joints).
- Design guidelines: Staff will work with the contract landscape architect to draft design standards, define acceptable materials and structural/load considerations (H‑20 rating for emergency vehicle access where needed), and provide aesthetic standards that preserve neighborhood character.
- Cost and timeline: Staff estimated consulting and drafting work at roughly $10,000 and said funds are available in existing budgets; the landscape guideline revisions will return to the council for formal review and adoption in a subsequent meeting.
Public comments
One resident urged caution, noting the importance of groundwater recharge and asking the city to walk carefully before widening paved front‑yard areas. Council members emphasized the need to preserve trees and neighborhood character while addressing parking needs.
Next steps
Staff will return with draft guideline language, example installations and a proposed implementation and permitting process for council consideration in the coming months.
