Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Diversion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Special services docket described as alternative for low‑level misdemeanors; presenters cite high success metrics
Summary
Speakers described the special services docket as an alternative to traditional prosecution for many low‑level municipal misdemeanors, focusing referrals on those with behavioral-health needs and citing data on recidivism and program graduation rates.
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Diversion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenters described the City of Tulsa's special services docket as an alternative to traditional prosecution and sentencing for many low‑level municipal misdemeanor offenses, emphasizing its role in connecting participants to treatment and social services.
A presenter said the docket excludes violent crimes, high‑level property damage and other offenses that would put people at risk, but covers many offenses tied to an individual's health or social circumstances. The Mental Health Association (presenter identified the organization) was described as providing clinical case management services for the docket and as a key partner in connecting defendants to services.
Presenters said open charges are dismissed at no cost upon graduation, fines and costs are suspended, and some more serious offenses that could affect employment may be dismissed and expunged at no cost to the defendant. A city official cited outcome data saying about 90 percent of program graduates had no new charges within six months, and about 75 percent had no new charges at roughly one year. Presenters said the program exceeded initial goals (original goal 60 participants) and that the city had set a goal to double participation but the program was approaching triple the original target.
Speakers said the docket represents an evolution in public‑safety strategy by addressing underlying causes of criminal behavior and focusing on treatment and long‑term outcomes rather than incarceration alone. No new funding or ordinance change was presented as part of the session.
