Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Votes at a glance: Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission, Oct. 13, 2025

October 13, 2025 | Colleyville, Tarrant County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Votes at a glance: Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission, Oct. 13, 2025
The Colleyville Planning and Zoning Commission took votes on a series of zoning and plat matters on Oct. 13, 2025. Key outcomes: a special use permit for a new restaurant’s on‑site alcohol sales, approvals for an accessory dwelling unit and EV charging stations, and plat approvals for two subdivisions were granted; an amendment to the Oak Alley PUD seeking removal of a 25‑foot landscape easement for one lot was denied (see separate article).

Votes at a glance

- Truva Mediterranean Bar & Grill (1205 Church Street) — Case ZC25‑25: Approved 7–0. Staff described the request as a special use permit to allow on‑premises alcoholic beverage sales at the former Black Walnut Cafe site. Motion to approve by Commissioner Remley; second by Commissioner Groves. Vote: Groves (aye), Ebert (aye), Savoy (aye), Obinabo (aye), Remley (aye), Arnold (aye), Bevel (aye).

- Accessory dwelling (1005 Tinker Road) — Case CC25‑27: Approved 7–0. Staff said the proposal converts part of an existing permitted accessory structure into a roughly 375‑square‑foot accessory dwelling unit; no exterior changes were required and staff recommended approval. Motion to approve by Commissioner Savoy; second by Commissioner Obinabo. Vote: unanimous.

- EV charging stations (Walmart Neighborhood Market, 4904 Colleyville Boulevard) — Case CC25‑28: Approved 7–0. The applicant proposed four charging units serving eight parking spaces, modest on‑site signage and refreshed landscaping; staff recommended approval under Land Development Code section 3.24. Motion to approve by Commissioner Obinabo; second by Commissioner Savoy. Vote: unanimous.

- Replat — Meadows Creek offices edition (8098 Precinct Line Road) — Case PC25‑19: Approved 7–0. The replat subdivides an existing lot into two commercial lots; no new development was proposed and staff recommended approval. Motion to approve by Commissioner Gross; second by a commissioner; vote unanimous.

- Preliminary/Final plat — Holt Farms edition (John McCain Road) — Case PC25‑20: Approved 7–0. The plat follows a May zoning change and creates 10 lots; staff confirmed the plat complies with the city’s subdivision and zoning regulations. Motion to approve by Commissioner Groves; second by Commissioner Savoy; vote unanimous.

Meeting procedure and staff notes

Staff presented each case, summarized submissions and the notice responses, and conducted public hearings where required. For the restaurant SUP and the EV chargers staff reported no opposition; for the Oak Alley PUD amendment staff had provided commissioners with letters both for and against and had counted 16 in favor and 10 opposed in the broader notice area (the opposition percent was below the 20% threshold that would change council voting requirements). The accessory dwelling and plats drew no opposition and were presented as compliant with relevant code sections.

Who spoke on these items

Staff: Ben Bridal, Director of Community Development, presented multiple items including the restaurant SUP and the Oak Alley PUD amendment. Applicants and project representatives who spoke included an applicant team for the Oak Alley request (the Bridal family), and for the EV chargers: Eric John (Kimley‑Horn) and Mina Zackie (store manager, Walmart Neighborhood Market). Developers/representatives for plats included Paul Rosthern of Cali Custom Homes for Holt Farms.

Why this matters

These routine approvals will allow a new downtown restaurant to operate with on‑site alcohol sales, permit an accessory dwelling in an existing structure, install public EV chargers at a neighborhood market and advance two plats toward development. The one significant contested item — the Oak Alley easement amendment — was denied and underscores how negotiated buffers in PUDs can limit later changes to lot uses and trigger neighborhood opposition.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI