Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homeschool Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board declines to send homeschooling participation policy back to committee after public debate
Summary
After extended public comment, the Cinnaminson board voted not to refer proposed changes to policy 2431 (student participation by homeschooled students) back to the policy committee. The decision followed competing public views and questions about safety and access to extracurriculars.
The Cinnaminson Township School District Board of Education considered a motion at the March 8 meeting to refer Policy 2431—concerning homeschool student participation in district activities—back to the policy committee for revision. The motion failed after a recorded vote.
Background and public comment: Multiple members of the public urged the board to reconsider the policy. Doug Lasalle, a resident who researched neighboring districts, urged the board to revisit Policy 2431 and cited multiple regional districts that allow homeschooled students to participate in extracurricular activities and athletics. Members of the public also raised questions about fairness and access. A parent who identified herself as a resident asked where the district’s student-photography/copyright rules reside and raised a separate question regarding the policy; the board directed questions about policy wording to the policy committee.
Board discussion and outcome: Board members clarified that a “yes” vote would have sent Policy 2431 back to the policy committee for further review. After roll-call voting, the motion to refer the policy back to committee did not receive a majority and therefore failed. The president announced, “No. Motion does not pass. It does not go back to committee.” No formal amendment to the policy was adopted that evening.
Why it matters: Policy 2431 governs whether and how students who are educated at home may participate in district activities, including extracurriculars and athletics. Several residents said nearby districts allow such participation and urged the board to reconsider; others raised concerns about program capacity and operational issues. Board members said the policy remains under the board’s purview and that committee-level review can be requested again at a future meeting.
Next steps: The policy remains as adopted until the policy committee or the board places it on a future agenda for amendment. Several public speakers invited the board to examine practices in neighboring districts and to provide clearer guidance about any safety or administrative constraints.
