Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Task force amends property-development exactions bill to limit fees, add appeals process

5942518 · October 16, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Members of the Regulatory Reduction Task Force amended draft legislation that would limit when local governments can impose mitigation or exaction fees on residential development, add an appeal and individualized-determination process, and set percentage caps; the committee asked staff for revised drafts and further outreach.

Cheyenne — The Regulatory Reduction Task Force on Wednesday amended draft legislation addressing property development exactions, narrowing the bill’s scope and adding procedural protections for developers and permit applicants.

The draft under review, 25 LSO 0134, as presented by David Hopkinson of the Legislative Service Office, would restrict land-use permitting authorities from requiring impact or mitigation fees for residential development unless the fee is “specifically and uniquely attributable to the cost of mitigating an identified adverse impact.” Hopkinson told members the working group raised that higher standard after reviewing case law and stakeholder input.

The measure would: exempt single‑family residences of 2,500 square feet or less and multifamily units of 1,250 square feet or less from exaction charges; permit a statutory cap on fees calculated as a percentage of total construction, renovation or addition cost (the committee later set that placeholder percentage at 2 percent for the draft under consideration); and create an administrative appeal process and the right to seek judicial review.

Why it matters: jurisdictions across Wyoming use mitigation fees, but the bill’s backers and critics told the task force that inconsistent methods and unclear definitions create legal risk and local contention. The draft tries to reconcile constitutional limits described by courts with local governments’ desire to fund infrastructure and housing mitigation.

Key provisions and procedure

Hopkinson summarized the bill’s core tests…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans