Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Waynoka Public Schools board approves consent agenda, several contracts and a staff-lunch price increase

October 13, 2025 | Waynoka Public Schools, School Districts, Oklahoma


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Waynoka Public Schools board approves consent agenda, several contracts and a staff-lunch price increase
The Waynoka Public Schools Board of Education voted to approve the consent agenda and a series of routine measures, including surplus declarations, an election resolution, several contracts and a small increase in the staff lunch price.

The actions were taken by roll call vote during the district's regular board meeting. Most motions passed unanimously or by clear majorities after short discussion or presentation of quotes and staff recommendations.

Votes at a glance
- Consent agenda (items 4a–4h): Approved. Motion: (not specified). Second: Travis. Vote tally recorded on the transcript as three "Yes" responses.
- Declaration of items on Attachment A as surplus property (item 6): Motion by Garrett; second by John. Vote tally on the transcript: three "Yes" responses. Outcome: approved.
- Annual election resolution for the 2025–26 school year (item 7): Motion by John; second by Garrett. Vote tally on the transcript: five "Yes" responses. Outcome: approved (resolution called for an election; text of the resolution not provided in transcript).
- Replacement of the softball-field irrigation system (item 9): Motion by Clayton; second by John Hagel. District presented a quoted price from Elevate Course Management at roughly $24,097 (transcript reads "$24.09 70"). Vote tally on the transcript: four "Yes" responses. Outcome: approved; vendor: Elevate (as read in transcript).
- Declare 2015 Suburban (vehicle) surplus and authorize superintendent to advertise for bids (item 10): Motion (not specified); second by John. Vote tally on the transcript: three "Yes" responses. Outcome: approved; superintendent directed to set date/time/place for bid opening.
- Extra-duty contract for the Oklahoma Teacher Empowerment Program for 2025–26 (item 11): Motion to approve; objection recorded by John during discussion. Motion passed by vote tally reported as four "Yes" responses on the transcript. Outcome: approved (objection noted in the record).
- Appointment of Stephen L. Smith Corp. as financial consultants for fiscal year 2025–26 (item 12): Motion by Gary; second by Travis. Vote tally on the transcript: three "Yes" responses. Outcome: approved; appointee: Stephen L. Smith Corp.
- Contract for secondary career and technology education programs for 2025–26 (item 13): Motion by John; second by Trevor. Vote tally on the transcript: four "Yes" responses. Outcome: approved (contract details not specified in transcript).
- Increase in staff meal prices for 2025–26 (item 14): District reported that student meals remain free; staff lunch price raised from $2.95 to $3.00 and staff breakfast price to $3.00. Motion by John; second by Garrett. Vote tally on the transcript: four "Yes" responses. Outcome: approved.

What the board authorized and what remains unspecified
The board authorized routine procurement and administrative steps: declaring surplus property, advertising a vehicle sale, appointing financial consultants, and approving contracts. For several items the transcript records motion/second and approval but does not include the full contract text, vendor scope, or ordinance/resolution language; where the transcript did not provide those details, this article does not invent them.

Procedural notes
Several motions were handled on the consent agenda or with brief discussion; recorded objections or clarifying remarks (for example, one objection by John on the extra-duty contract) were included in the meeting record but did not prevent approval. The transcript records vote tallies as sequences of "Yes" utterances; counts in this summary match those explicit yes responses in the transcript.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Oklahoma articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI