Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Selectmen accept 2016 Ford F‑150 surplus vehicle for fire use, 4‑1 vote
Summary
The board accepted a surplus 2016 Ford F‑150 from the federal surplus program for use by the Alton Fire Department as a secondary wildland/utility vehicle; transportation and immediate outfitting costs were discussed and the board voted 4–1 to accept the vehicle.
Get email alerts on the Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The board voted to accept a 2016 Ford F‑150 made available through the federal/state surplus program for use by the Alton Fire Department. The vehicle, a 2016 F‑150 with approximately 28,000 miles, arrived to the town on a permanent loan from the State of New Hampshire after the town covered transport costs.
Fire department staff said the vehicle would be used as a secondary wildland/forestry and utility vehicle for trainings, inspections and nonprimary duties. Staff explained the acquisition reduces reliance on a 2,500‑series pickup that is frequently used for primary response and towing, and it could reduce the department’s mileage reimbursements and personal-vehicle exposure.
The town paid a $2,100 transportation fee to receive the vehicle; staff also reported the truck’s tires are original to 2016 and must be replaced at an estimated cost of about $1,000. The chief and town staff inspected the truck and reported no major mechanical concerns beyond the tires; they noted the vehicle is rust free and roadworthy.
Board members debated process concerns because the vehicle was placed “in route” quickly through the surplus program before the item returned on the board agenda; one member said the procurement process felt rushed. The chief and town administrator explained the surplus program moves rapidly and desirable vehicles are often claimed quickly. Several selectmen said future surplus-vehicle inquiries should include department representation and clearer pre-approvals.
Following discussion, the board voted to accept the vehicle. The meeting record shows the motion passed with four votes in favor and one opposed; the dissenting member said the process had been mishandled but did not object to the vehicle itself.

