Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council refers dusk‑to‑dawn bike‑path ordinance repeal to counsel after public comments on safety and access

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents and riders urged the council to repeal the town ordinance that closes the South County bike path from dusk to dawn. Councilors asked legal and police staff to study liability, safety upgrades and possible roadway alternatives and to report back with options.

Public comment and a council discussion on the South County bike path drew speakers who said the dusk‑to‑dawn prohibition hinders safe transportation options, particularly for workers and students who rely on the path after dark.

Several public commentators, including cyclists and advocates, urged councilors to repeal the ordinance that prohibits use of the bike path from dusk until dawn. "The bike path is not just for recreation," said one speaker; "many people use it for transportation and it is often safer than riding on roads identified by the town as high‑risk for vulnerable users." Another commenter said that removing the prohibition would prevent pushing riders onto Route 108 or Route 138, which the town’s own safe‑streets review lists as higher risk locations.

Councilors asked the town solicitor and police chief to review the existing ordinance and present options that would balance access and liability. Suggestions included exploring targeted lighting or illuminated signage at key crossings, looking to Rhode Island Department of Transportation for support where the state paid for prior path upgrades, and evaluating whether the path should be treated more as a transportation corridor than a park space subject to park‑closing rules.

No repeal vote was taken; the item was referred to counsel and to the police chief for a memo and recommended next steps. Council members said they would consider practical measures—signage, targeted lighting, or requiring riders to use lights and reflective gear—rather than blanket restrictions, but they also noted potential costs and legal considerations.

Council staff will report back with options that address enforcement, liability and required infrastructure if the council wishes to open the path after dusk.