This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Clay County commissioners reviewed a contractor and owner's-representative analysis of median removals on County Road 218 and did not approve changes after discussion and public input.
WGI owner’s representative Carlos Campos presented two design options: remove medians and install dual left-turn lanes for an approximately 800-foot east section (estimated incremental cost about $15,000) and a roughly 600-foot west section (estimated incremental cost about $45,000). Staff said the design change would require lowering the posted speed limit in the affected area from 45 mph to 40 mph to meet design criteria for a five-lane section with opposing left turns.
Campos said the contractor could incorporate the change without scheduling delay if the board provided prompt direction because crews were active in the corridor; delaying a direction could add expenses and schedule impacts if median work was already completed.
County Engineer Richard Smith and staff noted the corridor is a transitioning access classification with many driveways and businesses, and they cautioned that a future increase in traffic could require additional access management steps. The board heard that the proposed opposing-left configuration (sometimes called an “opposing left” or bidirectional left-turn lane) carries different safety tradeoffs than a fully divided median.
Commissioners also discussed whether the change would prompt additional requests elsewhere on the corridor. Staff pointed out that older parcels and driveways had been contacted as part of the project outreach.
A petition from area property owners asking for the change was presented to the board, but when a commissioner moved to adopt the medians-to-dual-lefts change there was no second; the motion therefore failed and no formal change was approved.
The board did not schedule a further vote; staff will continue coordination with the contractor and report any schedule or cost impacts if the board asks for the change at a future meeting.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,055 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit