Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Greenbelt reviews FY26 recreation budget as pool renovations, staffing and event costs squeeze spending

5937091 · April 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff and council reviewed the FY26 proposed recreation budget, hearing that Recreation faces an approximate $4 million shortfall in the city budget and is proposing program and personnel adjustments while continuing capital projects and ARPA-funded programs.

Greenbelt City Council and recreation staff on Monday reviewed the proposed FY26 recreation budget as department leaders described a multi‑million dollar shortfall in the city’s overall finances, planned cuts to nonessential accounts, and ongoing capital work on the indoor and outdoor pools.

City Manager Salmarone told the council, “This particular budget has some challenges. As you know, we had a over $4,000,000 deficit,” and said the direct impact to recreation would be cuts to training and some direct services because there were few vacancies staff could hold open.

The budget matters because recreation is one of the city’s largest front‑facing departments and funds camps, pools, arts programs, therapeutic services and special events that serve thousands of residents and nonresidents. Council members and staff framed the discussion around preserving core programs (camps and lessons), completing capital work already underway, and limiting the effect on seasonal programming that generates substantial user revenues.

Most important items and immediate impacts

- Size and staffing: Recreation Director Greg Varda summarized the FY26 proposal as covering nine sub‑budgets (administration, arts, aquatics & fitness, museum, therapeutic recreation, community center, recreation centers, recreation programs, and special events). He reported proposed total expenditures “around 8,500,000.0, with total revenues approximately around 2,000,000.” The proposal also shows a reduction in total FTEs driven by specific vacancy management (for example a vacant aquatics coordinator position held until January).

- Personnel costs and COLA: The FY26 request includes a proposed 2% cost‑of‑living adjustment (COLA) for non‑classified employees — the third consecutive year council has considered or adopted a 2% COLA — and a 3% performance pool. Staff told council that roughly 70% of the department budget is wages and salaries.

- Program priorities and cuts: To balance the books, staff…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans