Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Displays 10 Commandments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses posting historical documents including 10 Commandments; attorney advises mixed-display approach
Summary
Board reviewed a state law permitting displays of historic documents (including the 10 Commandments) so long as displays do not promote a particular religion; members asked legal staff to research implementation and funding.
Get email alerts on the School Displays 10 Commandments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Doctor James and the board discussed constituent requests and emails about posting the Ten Commandments in schools. The boards attorney explained a North Carolina statute that permits school systems to display documents and objects "of historical significance that have formed and influenced the U.S. legal or governmental system," listing examples including the Magna Carta, the Mecklenburg Declaration, the preamble to the North Carolina Constitution, the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Ten Commandments.
The attorney emphasized a statutory caveat: displays may include religiously-associated documents but "no display shall seek to establish or promote religion or to persuade any person to embrace a particular religion, denomination of religion, or other philosophy." He told the board the law invites displays that include historical documents of varied kinds and that a display composed of several items from the enumerated list (rather than a lone religious text) better fits the statutory purpose.
Board members debated constitutional risks and community diversity. Some members said they supported posting the Ten Commandments as part of a broader historical set; others raised concerns about space, diversity of faiths and whether a permanent display could be seen as an endorsement of religion. The attorney advised that a display should be exhibited for secular, historical purposes and that a First Amendment analysis might still be required; he recommended the board specify whether displays would be permanent or rotating and how schools would be asked to implement any directive.
Several board members requested the attorney research implementation, legal risk, and potential funding to bring the idea back for formal consideration. No formal board action was taken during the meeting.

